According to Alok Prasad Putul ““Farmers in India have been using Pepsi and Coca–Cola as a cheaper alternative to pesticides.”’’ Therefore, asides from being poisonous to the body of humans, these drinks are utilized in other areas around the world.

One of the leading voluntary agencies in India named (CSE), The Centre for Science and Environment, made the allegation that in India, soft drinks produced which include names like Coca-cola and Pepsi are made up of high amounts of residues from pesticide, and because of this, farmers utilize them in battling pests as they can are less expensive than the standard pesticides.

It is less costly to purchase a bottle of coke than clean water in third world countries. This drink went through tests because of its effectiveness in cleaning. It has been realized to be very ideal for cleaning tile grout, oil stains and getting rid of cabinet stains.

Specimen from 12 leading soft drinks were analyzed by the CSE in 2003, and it was discovered that they all contained leftovers of four pesticides and pesticides that are highly toxic. Some of which include; DDT, Malathion, chlorpyrifos and lindane.

The following was reported by the director of CSE, Sunita Narain at a News Announcement.

“Some pesticide leftovers surpassed the maximum amount allowed in the specimen tested. The limit of pesticide mg per liter in water utilized on food, which was created by the European Economic Commission (EEC).”

Scientists from CDS have made reports that the level of chlorpyrifos was forty-two times more, the leftovers of Malathion were eighty-seven times more elevated and the amount of lindane which is illegal in the United States was 21 times more than the EEC limits. Also, they also reported that the toxins could also result in long-term cancer, damage to reproductive and nervous systems, severe disruption to the immune system and congenital disabilities.

The discovery of the CDS shows that samples from Pepsi and Coca-cola had almost related levels of pesticides residues. The Coca-cola samples were higher than the norms of EEC by forty-five times while the Pepsi samples were 37 times above EEC standards.

These discoveries were soon invalidated by the Pepsi and Coca-cola chiefs in the Indian subsidiaries. The president of Coca-Cola India, Sanjeev Gupta, stated that the results reported by the CSE were “not fair” and his company was governed to a “trial by media”.

The companies refuted the result that their products were utilized instead of pesticides as they are not made up of anything useful for pest control.

Nonetheless, farmers situated in the Rajnandgaon, Dhamtari and Durg districts of Chhattisgarh stated that Coke and Pepsi were used in battling pests on their rice plantations.

The use of these drinks significantly improved the sale of these drinks in isolated villages. A litter of the three most recognized pesticides in India, Tracer, Avant and Nuvocron cost about 10,000 rupees in comparison to one and a half liter of coca-cola which was locally made and had a price tag of 30 rupees.

In other words, if a bottle of Coke or Pepsi is mixed with water and sprayed on a crop by a farmer, it would be cheaper by 55-60 rupees per acre. The effects of this method haven’t been validated yet.

Devendra Sharma, who is an agricultural specialist, stated that farmers were mistaking in thinking these drinks were similar to pesticides as these drinks include sugar syrups which attract insects when sprayed on plants which then ingest the larva of pests.

It was also alleged that asides from these drinks. Other non-alcoholic beverages with cola and drinks which were locally manufactured had the same effect as well. Farmers stated that Thumbs up, Pepsi, alongside some other local soft drinks were also efficient.

The primary ingredients every cola similarly has include sugar and water but phosphoric acids and citric are added by manufacturers.

Mr. Sharma stated that the habit of utilizing syrups on pests isn’t new

“  jaggery which was produced using sugarcane was frequently used for control of pests. Coca-cola and Pepsi are being utilized for the same purpose. Sugary solutions have been used by farmers traditionally entice red ants that devour larvae of insects, I believe the same roles are being performed by cola.”

On another aspect, this is explained in another way by another scientist, Sanket Thakur:

“Everything that is occurring is that plant get the supply of sugar and sunlight directly which enhances the immunity of the plants, and the whole plantation ends up producing better crops.”

American coke consists of high level of high fructose corn syrup which may work as an efficient pesticide due to the fact that cocktail has a high degree of concentration of simple sugars glucose and fructose.

Yet, Anupam Verma, the Chhattisgarh Pepsi manager at the period claimed that this wasn’t the reason for the increase in sales figure by 20 percent.

“If these allegations were true, we would prefer selling pesticide as opposed to soft drinks because sales of pesticide is more profitable than beverages. Their allegations reek of lies.”

B. Mathur and Sapna Johnson who were CSE scientists made claims that their initial presumption was that producers of these soft drinks were getting a supply of water from ground water, which is highly contaminated by indiscriminate usage of many pesticides over the years.

Source: Diet Of Life